A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal web page inside of a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted national interest following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives property at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a very publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development works at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek out to build their family members household. The situation is now emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining made by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their scheduling permission by building a wall further than the boundaries of their internet site, resulting in an encroachment on the Distinctive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, specifically within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partially designed, is in the right posture. Their lawful staff has characterised the action being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their view, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waist-substantial drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which has due to the fact turn out to be emblematic of your intensity with the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they have been intended to Assemble visual proof of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water throughout intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this sort of steps ended up cited to display Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated intimately because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the background and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether or not interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be referred to as meticulous in his assessment of setting up files, maps, and ailments attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is motivated by issue for environmental protection and adherence to planning legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal view, insisting as an alternative that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to create a spouse and children dwelling in accordance With all the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Spot of Conservation and say that all functions are already performed based on Experienced assistance and permitted strategies. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into the sea through a storm, do not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over building of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for any condition that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is now a lot more contentious.
The Irish Moments article about René Collier mentioned that the businessman had Earlier been involved with nearby advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very different Experienced backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-superior water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both equally the Bodily reality of your coastline and also the symbolic nature of your act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an extreme method.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The courtroom will have to identify if the wall as designed complies with scheduling permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Special Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning ailments. Nevertheless the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Dwell together with each other extensive following the lawful expenses are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design will work at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the situation increase beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems including environmental safety and home legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of pure splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, removed, or completed as planned will count on the court docket’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably proceed to look in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.